Category: TPS Power Ratings

2002 Final TPS Power Ratings

Must have participated in seven or more eligible events. Information is provided in the following order:
– TPS Power Rating.
– Number of Eligible Tournaments participated in.
– Wins & Losses (in eligible games only)
– Won-Lost % (in eligible games only)
– Team Name.
– Team’s Home Base.
OLD SCOUT (#)
01. 120.622 (15) (71-13) 84.5% Backman/Smith/Menosse/Easton, San Jose, CA (#1)
02. 113.945 (15) (60-26) 69.8% Hague/Resmondo/Walser/Worth, Columbus, OH (#2)
03. 112.262 (15) (70-17) 80.5% Long Haul/Taylor Bros/Shen Corp/TPS, Albertville, MN (#4)
04. 109.153 (13) (35-24) 59.3% Mid-South/Mizuno, Portage, IN (#5)
05. 107.866 (16) (52-24) 68.4% Chase/Reece/Roosters/Easton, Wilmington, NC (#3)
06. 95.564 (13) (50-21) 70.4% Budweiser/Summerlin/Team Experts/Worth, College Station, TX (#10)
07. 91.165 (09) (28-18) 60.9% Team Mizuno, Ft Pierce, FL (#16)
08. 89.989 (11) (37-18) 67.3% Mountain Top/Advanced/USA Cash/TPS, Northville, MI (#9)
09. 89.436 (09) (23-19) 54.8% Sunnyvale V&F/Easton, Sunnyvale, CA (#NA)
10. 87.409 (09) (17-21) 44.7% WW Gay/Aubrey’s/TPS, Gainesville, FL (#7)
11. 86.077 (07) (20-14) 58.8% Hooters/B&B/Rew/Mizuno, Overland Park, KS (#15)
12. 85.138 (10) (25-23) 52.1% Phonemasters/K&G/TPS, Wood River, IL (#12)
13. 84.686 (08) (21-18) 53.8% New Construction, Shelbyville, IN (#11)
14. 82.704 (07) (22-11) 66.7% Florida Heat/Nave Plumbing/Joe Black’s/Worth, Ft. Pierce, FL (#6)
15. 79.880 (07) (18-15) 54.5% Creative Stucco/Easton, Columbus, OH (#17)
16. 77.019 (11) (32-19) 62.7% Twin States/Worth, Montgomery, AL (#8)
17. 74.634 (11) (16-21) 43.2% Team AH/TPS, Dayton, OH (#NA)
18. 68.552 (13) (24-27) 47.1% Doc’s/Mizuno, Sioux City, IA (#20)
19. 58.192 (08) (11-21) 34.4% Strike Zone, San Antonio, TX (#NA)
20. 54.144 (10) (10-22) 31.3% Texans Softball Club, Houston, TX (#NA)

2001 Final TPS Power Ratings

Information is provided in the following order:
– TPS Power Rating.
– Number of Eligible Tournaments participated in.
– Wins & Losses (in eligible games only)
– Won-Lost % (in eligible games only)
– Team Name.
– Team’s Home Base.
1. 102.317 (14) (70-06) 92.1% – Long Haul/Taylor/Shen/TPS, Albertville, MN
2. 94.056 (13) (53-18) 74.6% – Dan Smith/Backman/Menosse/Easton, San Jose, CA
3. 89.534 (14) (57-29) 66.3% – Hague/Resmondo/Specialty/TPS, Columbus, OH
4. 83.784 (09) (33-16) 67.3% – Reece/Roosters/Easton, Canal Winchester, OH
5. 83.771 (12) (49-21) 70.0% – Budweiser/Summerlin/Easton, College Station, TX
6. 80.381 (11) (41-17) 70.7% – Pov’s/Walser/TPS, Brooklyn Center, MN
7. 78.330 (05) (15-12) 55.6% – Mercer’s/K&G/TPS, North Vernon, IN
8. 77.588 (06) (21-11) 65.6% – Quick Roofing/Advanced/Nike, Arlington, TX
9. 77.107 (05) (15-10) 60.0% – L & L Painting/TPS, Prattville AL
10. 77.068 (09) (24-18) 57.1% – Maroadi/Frank-n-Stein/Nike, Pittsburgh, PA
11. 72.476 (05) (16-09) 64.0% – Reds/J&J/Fairweather/Worth, Seattle, WA
12. 71.526 (07) (16-15) 51.6% – New Construction, Shelbyville, IN
13. 70.287 (05) (12-09) 57.1% – Mississippi/Worth, Jackson, MS
14. 69.851 (06) (08-10) 44.4% – Hooters/B&B/Easton, Overland Park, KS
15. 68.440 (11) (28-22) 56.0% – Aftershock/Easton, Alameda, CA

2000 Final TPS Power Ratings

Information is provided in the following order:
– TPS Power Rating.
– Number of Eligible Tournaments participated in.
– Wins & Losses (in eligible games only)
– Won-Lost % (in eligible games only)
– Team Name.
– Team’s Home Base.
01. 95.713 (16) (79-15) 84.0% Team TPS, Louisville KY
02. 92.250 (16) (68-16) 81.0% Dan Smith/Backman/Worth, San Jose CA
03. 89.903 (17) (73-25) 74.5% Long Haul/TPS, Albertville MN
04. 80.685 (15) (55-23) 70.5% Sunbelt Plastics, Centerville GA
05. 80.325 (16) (59-27) 68.6% BellCorp/Easton, Tampa FL
06. 77.246 (16) (48-32) 60.0% Hague/Resmondo/TPS, Columbus OH
07. 75.332 (16) (49-30) 62.0% Sunnyvale V&F/Easton, Sunnyvale CA
08. 68.371 (11) (32-20) 61.5% AJA/TPS, S Houston TX
09. 66.570 (09) (12-20) 37.5% Suncoast/Dudley, Sarasota FL
10. 66.315 (07) (13-15) 46.4% Reds/J&J/Fairweather/Worth, Tacoma WA
11. 65.676 (11) (23-24) 48.9% Roosters/A+/Astros/Easton, Reynoldsburg OH
12. 65.383 (05) (11-10) 52.4% Maroadi Transfer/Nike, Pittsburg PA
13. 65.300 (05) (12-10) 54.5% Hooters/Easton, Kansas City KS
14. 65.185 (05) (13-07) 65.0% Kevitt/J&H/Easton, Minneapolis MN
15. 63.924 (06) (09-11) 45.0% Craig’s Hitmen, Wadley AL

1998 Final TPS Power Ratings

Final 1998 TPS Ratings (Record) Rating
1. Team TPS, Louisville, KY (70-17) 91.400
2. Sunbelt/Dan Smith, Centerville, GA (59-23) 88.755
3. Sierra/TPS, Reno, NV (70-17) 88.147
4. Lighthouse/Worth, Stone Mountain, GA (56-20) 83.023
5. Wessel/Hague/SoJern/TPS, Cincinnati, OH (58-28) 79.690
6. Steele’s/R&D/Reda, Brook Park, OH (50-27) 74.600
7. Long Haul/Grover/Mizuno, Albertville, MN (36-20) 70.091
8. Reece/SportsWorld/Chip’s/TPS, Lebanon, TN (36-26) 64.007
9. Chase/Easton, Wilmington, NC (43-30) 61.151
10. O&S/TPS, South St. Paul, MN (25-20) 60.743
11. Xtreme/Hinson/Bike/Mizuno/Worth, Little Rock, AR (40-31) 59.032
12. Brandon’s, Wilmington, NC (18-18) 59.011
13. Herb’s/KCS/TPS, San Diego, CA (24-20) 58.579
14. Backstop/Easton/Bike/Mizuno, Aurora, IN (43-32) 58.387
15. RPM/TPS, Concord, CA (19-22) 53.056

1999 TPS Power Ratings

Rank-Team-City/State-(Record)-Rating

1. Dan Smith/Wessell/Worth, San Jose, CA (70-24) 91.08238
2. R&D/Easton, Lima, OH (64-22) 90.36988
3. Team TPS, Louisville, KY (77-14) 89.85300
4. Hendu’s/Long Haul/TPS, Albertville, MN (45-21) 87.02040
5. Hague/Resmondo/TPS, Columbus, OH (59-20) 86.98426
6. Team Easton, Burlingame, CA (56-27) 85.03568
7. KCS/TPS, Houston, TX
8. P&D/Tri-Gems/Tiger/Easton, Sommers, CT
9. JWM/Herb’s/TPS, Riverside, CA
10. Sunnyvale Valve/TPS, Sunnyvale CA
11. Paramount/TPS, Virginia Beach, VA
12. Herrin/TPS, Georgia
13. Creative Stucco/Easton, Columbus, OH
14. RPM/TPS, Concord, CA
15. Planet/Easton, Lexington, KY